FR

Change control expertise · READY method

Change controls that get closed, with no nasty surprises

Descriptions that are too vague, impacts discovered at implementation, files piling up overdue and blocking release. We bring rigour back where it all happens: the description, the committee assessment and the management, through to closure.

What we measured

A team empties the shelf of open change controls−22 %open change controls in four months, from 866 to 672
A consultant pushes a trolley of closed files109 out of 120overdue change controls closed in three months
A team shows an auditor a gauge that exceeds the target85 %of change controls covered by an audit remark closed, when the commitment was 50%

Results measured on two sites: a pharmaceutical chemistry site and a production site coming out of an audit.

A poorly described change is a poorly assessed change.The description carries everything: what isn’t in it will be neither assessed nor anticipated.

Describing a change is a skill. Not everyone can do it: the description must be owned by trained people whose role it is.

Do you recognise your change controls?

  • Overdue change controls that end up blocking release.
  • Vague descriptions that leave everyone to interpret the change.
  • Impacts discovered at implementation, or even afterwards.
  • An assessment done by a single person, without the functions concerned.
  • All changes handled the same way, with no clear priority.
  • Actions forgotten once the change has been approved.

Our approach: describe accurately, assess together, manage to the end

Entrust the description to change owners
1

Entrust the description to change owners

Not everyone can describe a change. Identified and coached change owners open the change controls, starting with their first files alongside us.

change ownerscoaching

A form that asks the right questions
2

A form that asks the right questions

What is changing, what is affected, who to involve: an opening form and a “change or no change” decision-support tool frame the description from the start.

opening formdecision support

Assess in a multidisciplinary committee
3

Assess in a multidisciplinary committee

Prepared through pre-reading, the committee answers three questions: what does the change affect (impacts), what must be anticipated during implementation (risks), what will it require (effort). Then it decides go or no go.

committeeimpacts, risks, effort

Calibrate and prioritise
4

Calibrate and prioritise

The assessment sets the type of change (major, minor, or not a change) and a priority from 1 to 4 according to criticality and effort. Each file gets the treatment it deserves, and the most important goes first.

type of changepriority from 1 to 4

Manage through to approval
5

Manage through to approval

Visual management of open items and of each person’s workload plan, in regular check-ins, to unblock files before they become overdue.

visual managementworkload plan

Manage implementation
6

Manage implementation

Blocking actions closed before implementation is authorised, synchronisation with release, communication to customers, then effectiveness review and closure.

blocking actionseffectiveness review

Three change control projects

Production site, two entities

Common management for the whole site

After deviations, CAPA and release, change control remained the blocking process. Visual management shared by both entities and system quality assurance.

  • Change or no change decision support
  • Criticality × effort prioritisation matrix
  • Management of open items and workload plan per person
Pharmaceutical chemistry site

A process redesigned with the teams

Three days of workshops to redefine the process, then two pilot areas: a filter before opening, writing rules, a team of experts to assess impacts and weekly visual management.

  • A pre-opening filter so that unnecessary change controls are no longer opened
  • 2 committees a week, production and quality control
  • More than 20 people consulted to set the final rules
866 → 672open change controls in four months
Production site, after a group audit

Clearing a change control backlog

An audit remark about change controls open for too long. File-by-file follow-up, with each person involved, through to final signature and closure.

  • 109 change controls out of 120 closed in three months
  • Each action chased with its owner
  • Blocked files decided on rather than left open
85%of the change controls in the remark closed, against 50% committed

See all our case studies

How an engagement works

Assess
1Assess

Analysis of data extracts and interviews with the people involved to understand your real process, then feedback on the blockers.

Redesign the process in workshops
2Redesign the process in workshops

Flow, roles and responsibilities, opening form, committee charter: your decisions, made in workshops with the decision-makers.

Coach change owners and committees
3Coach change owners and committees

Opening the first change controls with your change owners, and attending the first committees to challenge decisions.

Manage until autonomy
4Manage until autonomy

Visual management launched and run with you, then coaching of your internal lead and remote follow-up to keep the momentum.

Option · Reinforce your teams
+Option · Reinforce your teams

The Effective Quality Brigade helps clear a backlog: descriptions, committee preparation, action follow-up.

with the Effective Quality Brigade

Frequently asked questions about change control

What is change control in the pharmaceutical industry?

It’s the process that governs any modification to a process, equipment, supplier, document or system that may affect product quality. It ensures that every change is described, assessed, approved, implemented and verified.

Why is describing the change so important?

Because everything else follows from it: a poorly described change is poorly assessed, its impacts are discovered too late and its actions are poorly sized. Describing a change is a skill, entrusted to trained change owners.

How should a change control be assessed?

In a multidisciplinary committee, along three lines: impacts (what the change affects), risks (what must be anticipated during implementation) and the effort required. This assessment is used to calibrate the type of change and its priority.

How do you stop change controls from piling up overdue?

By managing them in two stages: up to approval for execution, then during implementation, with a view of open items, each person’s workload plan and the blocking actions to be closed before implementation.

Can you help us clear a change control backlog?

Yes: the Effective Quality Brigade can reinforce your teams, write descriptions, prepare committees or move actions forward, using the same method.

Are your change controls piling up?

Tell us about your situation in thirty minutes. We’ll tell you where time is lost in your process.

Tell us about your situation