FR

Batch record expertise · Ergonomic batch record

Simplify your batch records and speed up their review

Records that come back for correction, piled-up reviews, finished batches waiting to be released: we simplify your batch records and restructure their review flow, so they are right first time and go through review without waiting.

Results measured on our assignments

A quality manager sifts a batch record30 to 60%of unnecessary data removed from batch records
A quality manager stamps a right-first-time batch record80 to 90%right first time at the end of production, compared with 0 to 10% before
A reviewer checks a clear record, hourglass almost full−20 %review time, thanks to fewer correction loops
The batch and its record go from the line to the truck without waiting46 → 34 daysaverage release lead time in one month, thanks to the redesigned review flow
Modern pharmaceutical sites with approved batch records40+sites supported in simplifying their batch records

Averages observed on our assignments since 2018.

The batch record is a traceability medium, not a control tool.Its review checks the quality of the traceability, not the compliance of production.

Tuesday, 6 pm, the batch is finished. Two weeks later: “a signature is missing on page 12”. The operator is on leave, nobody remembers. What would have taken two minutes on the day takes two weeks, and meanwhile release is on hold.

Do you recognise your batch records?

  • Records that are rarely right first time and keep coming back for correction.
  • Finished batches waiting days, sometimes weeks, for their review to end.
  • Stacked reviews where everyone reviews everything and nobody feels responsible.
  • Errors discovered too late, when the operator no longer remembers.
  • Records of more than 100 pages, weighed down by years of CAPAs.
  • An electronic batch record project whose cost is frightening.

Our approach: simplify the record, then speed up its flow

A simple record isn’t enough if it then waits days in a review queue. We work on both, together or separately.

The record

An ergonomic batch record

Less data, a structure that follows the shop floor, errors that jump out: the record is right first time.

The flow

A restructured review flow

Clear review rules, review done on the line and a managed flow: the record goes through review without waiting.

Realign the structure with the shop floor
1The record

Realign the structure with the shop floor

We follow the actual sequence of operations, where they take place and how teams are organised, to remove the back-and-forth in the document that causes omissions.

structureshop-floor reality

Remove unnecessary data
2The record

Remove unnecessary data

Multiple signatures, copied dates, parameters already recorded elsewhere: the C.O.B.R.A. tool analyses each data item with 13 questions to keep only what is useful.

C.O.B.R.A.useful data

Make errors visible
3The record

Make errors visible

11 ergonomic principles create reflexes when filling in and reviewing: omissions jump out and are corrected immediately.

11 ergonomic principlesright first time

Redefine who reviews what
4The flow

Redefine who reviews what

When everyone reviews everything, nobody is responsible. We focus each review on real needs and set rules for direct correction, visible in the record.

review rulesdirect correction

Review the record on the line
5The flow

Review the record on the line

On-line review, at the workstation and with a suitable checklist, detects errors while the operator is still there. No record leaves production without being reviewed: final compilation takes 24 hours.

on-line reviewtraceability in-process checks

Manage the throughput time
6The flow

Manage the throughput time

A short ritual and duration indicators, from end of production to end of quality review, make visible the records that are waiting and quality assurance’s real workload.

throughput timeflow management

Three projects, three results

CDMO site, solid dosage forms and packaging

A record that finally lets the operator work

Packaging records where the operator was constantly writing, with in-process checks scattered over several pages. A “per shift” structure, copied data removed, times rather than dates.

  • In-process checks grouped: 4 pages → 1 per shift
  • A block of 44 data items → 5, time-stamped
  • Calculations reviewed once instead of three times
25 s → 1 min 30between two data entries, in packaging
Sterile production site, freeze-drying

More than half of the data wasn’t useful

A sterile filling record in which the operator entered one data item per minute. The C.O.B.R.A. analysis, item by item, with the production teams and QA, objectively determined what had to stay.

  • 1,553 data items analysed one by one
  • Nearly a quarter were unnecessary “compliant” or “done” tick boxes
  • 1 data item per minute to enter before simplification
56%of the record’s data judged not useful
Injectables production unit

Review moves onto the line, release speeds up

Records reviewed at the end of the batch and errors detected days later. Review documents rewritten, direct correction rules, on-line review per shift and flow management, from production to QA audit.

  • Old review flow fully cleared at start-up
  • 29 operators out of 33 and 10 QA staff out of 12 trained before launch
  • QA workload and capacity finally measurable
46 → 34 daysaverage release lead time, in one month

See all our case studies

How an engagement works

Two tracks in parallel, which you can also run separately: simplifying your records, and restructuring their review flow.

The recordSimplify your batch records

We do it for you
1We do it for you

We produce the first ergonomic batch record with your teams. It sets the rules and framework for the whole site: guiding principles, structure, review rules.

You do it, we support you
2You do it, we support you

Several people are coached in parallel on the following records. Each follows the same steps as we did in phase 1, but they do the work.

You roll it out, we follow up
3You roll it out, we follow up

For a few weeks or months, your coachees roll out to the rest of the records. Regular check-ins unblock them as soon as they get stuck.

Option · We roll it out with you
+Option · We roll it out with you

A large volume of records to handle? The Effective Quality Brigade takes on part of the roll-out, using the same method.

with the Effective Quality Brigade

The flowRestructure the review flow

We design
1We design

We design the new way of working with you along three lines: review rules, on-line review and flow management.

We put the set-up in place
2We put the set-up in place

Updating standards, training on the new way of working, communication, setting up management and change management.

We secure it on the shop floor
3We secure it on the shop floor

Three months of shop-floor support to secure execution: an intensive first month, then two lighter months.

Option · A batch record review room
+Option · A batch record review room

We help you design a batch release room: a dedicated space where records are reviewed, tracked and unblocked.

batch release room

Frequently asked questions about batch records

What is an ergonomic batch record?

It’s a batch record rebuilt to follow shop-floor reality: the actual order of operations, where they take place, how teams are organised. Unnecessary data is removed and the layout makes omissions and errors stand out, so they are corrected immediately.

Which data can be removed from a batch record?

Above all, data copied several times: multiple signatures, copied dates and times, parameters already present in the raw data. Our C.O.B.R.A. tool (Content Of Batch Record Analysis) analyses each data item with 13 questions to objectively assess its usefulness. Across more than a hundred records analysed, 30 to 55% of the data requested isn’t useful.

Is a simplified batch record GMP-compliant?

Yes. The approach is aligned with regulatory requirements and each removal is justified by a risk analysis. Our clients have in fact had positive feedback in inspections and customer audits, thanks to records that are clearer for operators.

What is on-line batch record review?

It means reviewing the record during production, at the workstation, with a suitable checklist, rather than at the end. An error found on the line is corrected in two minutes with the operator present; found two weeks later, it takes half a day and blocks release. Review becomes an in-process check of traceability.

What is a batch record’s throughput time?

It’s the time between the end of production and the end of the quality review. It is what delays batch release. We measure it, manage it with the teams, and restructure the review flow to reduce it.

Should we switch to an electronic batch record?

Not necessarily straight away, but an ergonomic record prepares the ground: the structure is aligned with the real process and the amount of data to integrate goes down, which directly affects the project cost. Ergonomic records are also perfectly suited to the “paper on glass” format.

Are your batches waiting for their records?

Tell us about your situation in thirty minutes. We’ll tell you where to start: the record, the flow, or both.

Tell us about your situation